Fikile Mbalula Says Julius Malema’s 5-Year Sentence Is Too Severe, Blames “Racist AfriForum”

The sentencing of Julius Malema to an effective five-year prison term for illegal firearm possession and related offences has triggered mixed reactions across South Africa’s political landscape.

Several opposition parties, including the DA, FF Plus, ACDP, and GOOD Party, welcomed the ruling, saying it reinforces the principle that no one is above the law. DA leader and Cape Town Mayor Geordin Hill-Lewis said the judgment sends a strong warning about gun-related crime and stressed the need for tough consequences to curb violence.

FF Plus MP Heloise Denner pointed to constitutional rules that could disqualify an MP from serving if sentenced to 12 months or more without the option of a fine, noting that the party will closely monitor whether Malema should remain in Parliament if his appeal fails.

ACDP MP Wayne Thring also supported the outcome, while GOOD Party Secretary General Brett Herron described the sentence as overly harsh compared to what prosecutors requested, though he still agreed that Malema must be held accountable.

In contrast, ANC Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula expressed sympathy for Malema, calling the sentence “too harsh” in a Facebook post. He blamed what he described as influence from “racist AfriForum” and suggested the ruling targeted those advocating for marginalised communities. He also referenced his past ties with Malema in the ANC Youth League.

The court in KuGompo City has granted Malema permission to appeal, although the conviction remains in place. His legal team is expected to challenge the sentence.

Parliament has yet to announce any formal position regarding his status as an MP, as it awaits the outcome of the appeal process.

The case continues to divide opinion nationwide, with supporters claiming political targeting and critics insisting it reflects necessary accountability under the law.